Fat times three. You’ll want to sit down for this


IMG_0828

A Surly fork and a 26 x 4.9 tire? Sure, that happens. A Surly fork, 26 x 4.9 tire and one-piece crank? That doesn’t happen as often…

IMG_0825

And I believe this cosmic confluence is even rarer.

But it happened at least once once. The proof is in Wheel & Sprocket’s Brookfield, Wisconsin, store.

Not big on a fat trike? How about a fat tandem?

Advertisements

About 16incheswestofpeoria

Former bicycle mechanic, current peruser of books, feeder of birds.
This entry was posted in Equipment, Other bicycles, Report from the road and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Fat times three. You’ll want to sit down for this

  1. lardavis says:

    Is there a limit reached, where it would be more advantageous to go to a track (think really wide Gates belt drive) in lieu of inflated tubular interface with the Earth’s crust? Would we need two parallel, with independent drive/brake so we could skid-steer? Or would we just make a vehicle where we sit inside the “ferris wheel” and stay upright by gyroscopic or side-thrust-rocket means?

    • Two possible outcomes of wide-tired tricycles: 1) In the future, tires become so wide that tricycles effectively become single-track machines, like bicycles, only more awesome, or 2) We all go back to riding downhill inside washing machine tubs.

  2. I’ll bet it is hard to get it moving.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s